|
Here's
what the experts have to say……
|
|
|
Pioneering
ion researcher Dr.Albert Krueger of University of California states "In
negative ion-rich air, psychoneurotic and somatic complaints disappear,
viral & bacterial growth is inhibited, and burns
heal faster with less scarring…… plus there are no detrimental side-effects
from negative ions in any dosage" Further proof…..More Studies Proving Effectiveness of Negative Ions
Ions & Computers
- From
'Taming the
terminal' by Mohinder Singh
Ions & Air-conditioning
- From August, 1982 issue of Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine.
Ions & Bacteria
A recent study by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture found that ionizing a room led to 52% less dust in the air, and 95% less bacteria in the air (since many of the pollutants found in the air reside on floating dust particles). The USDA also performed another study which proved that negative ions drastically reduced the airborne salmonella particles, prompting the following statement from the USDA: "These results indicate that negative air ionization can have a significant impact on the airborne microbial load and at least a portion of this effect is through direct killing of the organisms." The Agriculture Research Service of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture tested the effectiveness of ionizers for removing dust in a poultry hatchery. The dust level is very high in such an environment. In this study, the use of an ionizer resulted in dust removal efficiencies that averaged between 81.1 ~ 92.2%. The airborne transmission of salmonella (to the eggs) was also significantly reduced as a result. Journal of Hygiene Scientists showed that ionization reduced bacterial levels in burns and plastic surgery units by over 96% after a two week period, which results in much better and more rapid healing of patients. Journal of Applied Microbiology The use of negative ions was even found by scientists to reduce the presence of airborne viruses by about 40%. A study featured in the 1987 issue also showed the negative ions are free from any adverse side effects. Science A 1976 study featured in this publication provided evidence that negative ions can have a biologically lethal effect on airborne micro organisms. Journal of Hygiene A 1979 study found that using negative ionization in the air protected chickens from airborne infection of the deadly Newcastle Disease Virus. Journal of Food Protection A 2001 study found that airborne negative ionization was highly effective at destroying airborne and surface salmonella. University of Medicine and Pharmacy (Romania) A test on male rats showed that just moderate levels of negative ions increased the resistance of the rats, reducing or eliminating the effect of some chemicals. |